Wait-What Skill FAQ: When Your Agent’s Message Doesn’t Land
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the wait-what skill actually do?
Why is the skill only three lines long?
Why does it say 'wait' instead of 'be concise'?
What is ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English?
Do I need a CONTEXT.md for the skill to work?
Why won't the agent trigger it by itself?
Can I use it twice in a row?
How is it different from grill-with-docs?
When does it not help?
Is the 146K install number real?
Why a Wait-What FAQ Exists#
Matt Pocock’s wait-what skill is the youngest member of the mattpocock/skills family, and most write-ups skip it because a three-line skill looks like nothing to say. It isn’t. Git history shows it graduated into the productivity bucket on 2026-08-05, and its design document reads like a manifesto against verbose skills. I pulled the SKILL.md, that doc, the changeset, and the live leaderboard on 2026-08-27 — every claim below traces to one of those files.
The Short Answers#
- It’s a re-pitch command, not a style command.
/wait-whatsays “you lost me,” which is different from “be shorter.” - Three lines is the design. A longer skill teaches the model that verbosity matters.
- The agent never fires it. Both invocation flags forbid implicit triggering; only you type it.
- CONTEXT.md is optional. Without it you lose only the vocabulary half of the repair.
- It fixes the past; grill-with-docs fixes the future. Use both, in that order of urgency.
Three Lines, by Design#
The skill body, verbatim: “Wait, I don’t understand where you’ve got to here. Re-pitch that: give me a little bit of context, talk in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English, and use the ubiquitous language from CONTEXT.md (follow CONTEXT-MAP.md to the right one if the repo has more than one).”
Two details in that sentence do most of the work. The first is “that” — not “that last message.” What lost you is usually bigger than one paragraph, so the agent decides how far back to go. The second is “wait” itself. Every popular verbosity fix names the output — /tldr, /no-fluff, /talk-normal — and the model dutifully over-corrects into a register that is shorter and no clearer. Naming the listener asks for both halves at once: fewer words and the context you were missing.
The skill also plugs into language you already have. It reuses the leading words from your global CLAUDE.md and your project’s CONTEXT.md, so invoking it isn’t a new instruction — it’s a reminder of one the agent already agreed to. If the repo has several context files, CONTEXT-MAP.md routes the agent to the right one; that support arrived in the 2026-08-19 update, which also removed every em-dash from the repo and quoted the description to fix a YAML issue. Small history, but it shows how seriously the family treats this three-liner.
What the Install Numbers Say#
The snapshot from 2026-08-27 puts wait-what at #266 with 146,544 installs and a weekly curve that has climbed every single week since it appeared: 34,647 → 42,010 → 43,703. Compare it with its conversation-repair siblings:
| Skill | All-time installs | Last week | What it does |
|---|---|---|---|
| to-questionnaire | 206,673 | 43,485 | turns vague requests into structured questionnaires |
| writing-for-agents | 151,867 | 46,171 | teaches agents to write for other agents |
| wait-what | 146,544 | 43,703 | re-pitches a message that didn’t land |
| grill-with-docs | 840,134 | 62,108 | builds the shared language upfront |
The pattern worth noticing: the prevention skill (grill-with-docs) out-installs the repair skill by nearly 6x. People install the cure before they install the first aid kit. The weekly numbers also put to-questionnaire, writing-for-agents, and wait-what within a few thousand of each other — the family’s newest cohort is acquiring users at almost the same rate, which suggests one skill’s growth drags the others along.
Common Mistakes to Avoid#
Mistake #1: Waiting until you’re lost for ten minutes. The design doc says use it the second you notice you’re skimming. The agent has drifted into jargon it invented, stacked five acronyms, or explained a decision whose premise you never saw. That’s the moment, not after the third paragraph of damage.
Mistake #2: Using it to fact-check. If the agent stated something wrong, wait-what re-explains the same wrong thing more clearly. Check the claim yourself, or ask a pointed question, then re-pitch if needed.
Mistake #3: Expecting vocabulary from nowhere. With no CONTEXT.md, the re-pitch is clearer but stays generic. The skill’s own doc admits you lose only the domain-vocabulary half — so don’t blame the skill when invented nouns survive a re-pitch. That’s the shared-language job, and it belongs to grill-with-docs and domain-modeling.
Mistake #4: Treating it as a substitute for context capture. wait-what repairs one message after the fact. If messages keep not landing, the fix is a CONTEXT.md that captures the words you both use — prevention, not repair.
Start With the Next /wait-what#
Install the family with npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills — wait-what ships with the rest (handoff, grill-with-docs, and the engineering set come along in the same install). Next time the agent’s answer makes you skim, don’t ask it to be concise. Type /wait-what and watch it back up and re-pitch with the context you were actually missing. If the re-pitch is shorter and clearer, and your project’s real nouns come back, it worked — and it’ll work again the minute you need it.
Related Articles
AI Image Generation FAQ 2026: Tools, Prompts, and Workflow Answers
Answers to the most common questions about AI image generation in 2026 — the best tools, prompt techniques that work, and getting consistent results.
A2A Protocol vs MCP: Which Agent Communication Protocol Fits Your Stack?
A2A vs MCP — two protocols for AI agent communication, but they solve different problems. Here's when to use each, and when you need both.